🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 432+ reviews
Kidsβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Oshkosh 3/6m bubble romper

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.4 out of 5(432 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20
$33.33
Sale
βœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

flawless for summer, runs fancy 6/9m

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid fulfillment

↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Oshkosh 3/6m bubble romper

faultless for summer, runs fancy 6/9m

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1015359

Category: Kids > Girls Dresses > Girls 0-24 mos

Original Price:$33.33 USD

Sale Price:$20 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand solely-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5150 reviews
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Aurora, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
genuinely impressed​
rapid delivery and solid Vintage Oshkosh 3/6m bubble romper.
40 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Omaha, NE

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
top purchase ever
After some use, it is practical to use so I’m okay with it. Nothing fancy.
37 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
In daily use, the Vintage Oshkosh 3/6m bubble romper works as described and it’s fine overall.
28 people found this helpful​
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
only what I wanted
the Vintage Oshkosh 3/6m bubble romper is practical which is good enough.
33 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
impeccable purchase
After several use, the Vintage Oshkosh 3/6m bubble romper works fine so it’s acceptable.
17 people found this helpful