🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 888+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Women's Yellow Gingham Lolita Tiered Bloomer Shorts - up-to-date Casual Teen Girls' Shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(888 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$14.98​
$24.97
Sale
βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Fabric type: 100% PolyesterCare instructions: Hand Wash OnlyOrigin: ImportedMaterial: The ruffle shorts for women is made of top-grade polyster and spendex, soft, skin friendly and comfortableFine workmanship, The ruffle bloomer shorts for women is soft stretch, well shape and comfortableFeature: lace, ruffled layered, high waisted, shorts, lace bloomer shorts, elastic waisted, womens boxer shorts, bloomers for women, bloomer shorts for women, lace trim shorts for women, ruffled shorts for women, ruffle shorts women, ruffled bloomers for womenMatch: Women ruffle bloomer shorts, perfect for pairing with vest, shirts, boulse, jacket and other topsMANY OCCASIONS: Womens ruffle layered shorts are perfect for casual, night out, halloween party, beach,loungewear, pajamas, going out, yoga, home, vacation, keeping you comfortable and trendy and enjoying your leisure time.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy distribution
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Women's Yellow Gingham Lolita Tiered Bloomer Shorts - current Casual Teen Girls' Shorts

  • Fabric type: 100% Polyester
  • Care instructions: Hand Wash Only
  • Origin: Imported
  • Material: The ruffle shorts for women is made of supreme polyster and spendex, soft, skin friendly and plush
  • Fine workmanship, The ruffle bloomer shorts for women is tender stretch, well shape and soft
  • Feature: lace, ruffled layered, high waisted, shorts, lace bloomer shorts, elastic waisted, womens boxer shorts, bloomers for women, bloomer shorts for women, lace trim shorts for women, ruffled shorts for women, ruffle shorts women, ruffled bloomers for women
  • Match: Women ruffle bloomer shorts, superb for pairing with vest, shirts, boulse, jacket and other tops
  • MANY OCCASIONS: Womens ruffle layered shorts are perfect for casual, night out, halloween party, beach,loungewear, pajamas, going out, yoga, home, vacation, keeping you soft and trendy and enjoying your leisure time.

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1178048

Category: Women > CLOTHING > Lingerie, Sleep & Lounge

Original Price:$24.97 USD

Sale Price:$14.98 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7599 reviews

AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic product
Works smoothly. Good Women's Yellow Gingham Lolita Tiered Bloomer Shorts - fresh-age Casual Teen Girls' Shorts.
28 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly impressed
fine overall Women's Yellow Gingham Lolita Tiered Bloomer Shorts - current Casual Teen Girls' Shorts.
42 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
incredibly pleased
For the price, the Women's Yellow Gingham Lolita Tiered Bloomer Shorts - current Casual Teen Girls' Shorts works well enough so it’s acceptable. Nothing fancy.
14 people found this helpful​
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Atlanta, GA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
only what I wanted
The Women's Yellow Gingham Lolita Tiered Bloomer Shorts - present-day Casual Teen Girls' Shorts wasn’t exactly what I imagined, but it works well enough.
13 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
faultless purchase
The Women's Yellow Gingham Lolita Tiered Bloomer Shorts - present-day Casual Teen Girls' Shorts works solely fine.
44 people found this helpful